Screener
FLQL vs ABIG
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Argent Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.34% less per year.
- FLQL is significantly larger than ABIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQL follows a index tracking strategy; ABIG uses active selection.
- FLQL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQL | ABIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $51M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.99% | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -13.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQL and ABIG
Explore further