Screener
FLQM vs PGRO
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both FLQM and PGRO are equity ETFs. FLQM charges 0.30% a year and PGRO 0.49%. The main difference: FLQM follows a index tracking strategy; PGRO uses active selection.
- FLQM follows a index tracking strategy; PGRO uses active selection.
- FLQM costs 0.19% less per year.
- FLQM is much larger than PGRO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, PGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQM | PGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $117M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.5% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 16.46% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -34.73% |
Similar to FLQM and PGRO
Explore further