Screener
FLQS vs RODM
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.06% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than FLQS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQS covers north america markets; RODM covers global.
- FLQS follows a index tracking strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RODM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQS | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.34% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.31% | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -42.16% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQS and RODM
Explore further