Screener
FLRG vs AFMC
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.53% less per year.
- FLRG follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $153M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 0.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and AFMC
Explore further