Screener
FLRG vs FESM
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.13% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than FLRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLRG follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $5.0B |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 18.98% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and FESM
Explore further