Screener
FLRG vs OMFS
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.24% less per year.
- FLRG follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, FLRG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $275M |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and OMFS
Explore further