Screener
FLRN vs USLN
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF vs iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF
Key differences
- FLRN costs 0.25% less per year.
- FLRN is significantly larger than USLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLRN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRN | USLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $23M |
| Since | 2011 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.63% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.62 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.68% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.64% | -0.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRN and USLN
Explore further