Screener
FLUD vs BSV
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- BSV costs 0.12% less per year.
- BSV is significantly larger than FLUD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLUD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BSV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLUD | BSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $69.9B |
| Since | 2020 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +1.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.68% | 1.82% |
| Max drawdown | -1.67% | -8.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLUD and BSV
Explore further