Screener
FLUD vs ULST
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF vs State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
Key differences
- FLUD costs 0.05% less per year.
- ULST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLUD | ULST | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $600M |
| Since | 2020 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.68% | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -1.67% | -6.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLUD and ULST
Explore further