Screener
FLV vs CGVV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
Key differences
- CGVV costs 0.09% less per year.
- FLV follows a active selection strategy; CGVV uses index tracking.
- FLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLV | CGVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $128M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.06% | -10.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLV and CGVV
Explore further