Screener
FLXI vs PGHY
Invesco Flexible Income ETF vs Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PGHY is significantly larger than FLXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLXI follows a active selection strategy; PGHY uses index tracking.
- PGHY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXI | PGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $212M |
| Since | 2026 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 7.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.95% |
| Max drawdown | -3.51% | -20.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLXI and PGHY
Explore further