Screener
FLXR vs BINC
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BINC is significantly larger than FLXR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLXR is classified as mixed asset, while BINC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FLXR covers global markets; BINC covers north america.
- FLXR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $16.9B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.66% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -2.69% |
Similar to FLXR and BINC
Explore further