Screener
FLXR vs ENHI
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.13% less per year.
- FLXR is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLXR is classified as mixed asset, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FLXR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $11M |
| Since | 2018 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 5.66% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -5.65% |
Similar to FLXR and ENHI
Explore further