Screener
FLXR vs MUSE
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
Key differences
- FLXR costs 0.16% less per year.
- FLXR is significantly larger than MUSE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLXR is classified as mixed asset, while MUSE is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FLXR follows a active selection strategy; MUSE uses index tracking.
- FLXR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | MUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $39M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.66% | 7.59% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | 2.81% |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -3.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLXR and MUSE
Explore further