Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FLXR vs SBAR

TCW Flexible Income ETF vs Simplify Barrier Income ETF

FLXR

TCW Flexible Income ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$3.2B

SBAR

Simplify Barrier Income ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$343M

Key differences

FLXR is a fixed income ETF, while SBAR is an alternative ETF. FLXR charges 0.40% a year and SBAR 0.75%.

  • FLXR is a fixed income fund, while SBAR is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • FLXR follows a active selection strategy; SBAR uses option income.
  • FLXR covers global markets; SBAR covers North America.
  • FLXR costs 0.35% less per year.
  • FLXR is much larger than SBAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • FLXR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FLXRSBAR
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$3.2B$343M
Since20182025
Dividend yield5.71%12.70%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+5.5%+11.1%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y2.28%9.05%
Max drawdown-1.94%-5.32%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FLXR and SBAR