Screener
FMAG vs FORH
Fidelity Magellan ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- FMAG costs 0.62% less per year.
- FMAG is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMAG is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FMAG follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FMAG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMAG | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $20M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.32% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -32.93% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMAG and FORH
Explore further