Skip to content
Screener

FMAR vs FEBM

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February

FMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$1.2B

FEBM

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$48M

Key differences

Both FMAR and FEBM are alternative ETFs. FMAR charges 0.85% a year and FEBM 0.85%. The main difference: FMAR is much larger than FEBM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • FMAR is much larger than FEBM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

FMARFEBM
Annual cost (TER)0.85%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$1.2B$48M
Since20212025
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+17.2%+7.0%
CAGR 3Y+14.1%N/A
CAGR 5Y+10.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.13N/A
Volatility 1Y5.14%2.18%
Max drawdown-14.36%-2.60%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FMAR and FEBM