Screener
FMAT vs FFDI
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Developed
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.47% less per year.
- FMAT is significantly larger than FFDI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMAT | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $603M | $22M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 16.99% |
| Max drawdown | -41.11% | -14.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMAT and FFDI
Explore further