Screener
FMAT vs XLBI
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF vs State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.27% less per year.
- FMAT is significantly larger than XLBI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMAT is classified as equity, while XLBI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FMAT follows a index tracking strategy; XLBI uses option income.
- FMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMAT | XLBI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $603M | $6M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.11% | -10.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMAT and XLBI
Explore further