Skip to content
Screener

FMCE vs RWK

FM Compounders Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF

FMCE

FM Compounders Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$68M

RWK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.2B

Key differences

Both FMCE and RWK are equity ETFs. FMCE charges 0.72% a year and RWK 0.39%. The main difference: FMCE follows a active selection strategy; RWK uses index enhanced.

  • FMCE follows a active selection strategy; RWK uses index enhanced.
  • RWK costs 0.33% less per year.
  • RWK is much larger than FMCE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FMCERWK
Annual cost (TER)0.72%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$68M$1.2B
Since20242008
Dividend yield0.77%1.14%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+10.6%+29.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+17.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+11.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.78
Volatility 1Y12.61%16.90%
Max drawdown-11.69%-46.20%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to FMCE and RWK