Screener
FMCX vs ONEO
FM Focus Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Key differences
- ONEO costs 0.51% less per year.
- FMCX is significantly larger than ONEO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMCX follows a active selection strategy; ONEO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ONEO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ONEO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMCX | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115M | $27M |
| Since | 2022 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.7% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 12.91% |
| Max drawdown | -17.70% | -40.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMCX and ONEO
Explore further