Screener
FMET vs CGGR
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR is significantly larger than FMET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMET follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and CGGR
Explore further