Screener
FMET vs FFND
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.61% less per year.
- FMET follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $99M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and FFND
Explore further