Screener
FMET vs IVRS
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.08% less per year.
- FMET is significantly larger than IVRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FMET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | IVRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $8M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +2.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and IVRS
Explore further