Screener
FMET vs MPLY
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs Monopoly ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.40% less per year.
- FMET is significantly larger than MPLY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMET follows a index tracking strategy; MPLY uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | MPLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $13M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -13.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and MPLY
Explore further