Screener
FMET vs YJUN
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.51% less per year.
- FMET is classified as equity, while YJUN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FMET follows a index tracking strategy; YJUN uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, FMET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | YJUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $131M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | 6.88% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -21.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and YJUN
Explore further