Screener
FMF vs ISMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.18% less per year.
- FMF is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMF | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $266M | $57M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.00% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -16.89% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMF and ISMF
Explore further