Screener
FMKT vs CZAR
The Free Markets ETF vs Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.41% less per year.
- FMKT is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMKT follows a active selection strategy; CZAR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMKT | CZAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $2M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -17.79% | -13.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMKT and CZAR
Explore further