Screener
FNDA vs PSC
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.13% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than PSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDA | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.2B | $2.0B |
| Since | 2013 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.24% | 18.83% |
| Max drawdown | -44.64% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDA and PSC
Explore further