Screener
FNDA vs SCHG
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.21% less per year.
- SCHG is significantly larger than FNDA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDA | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.2B | $55.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.6% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.28% | 15.57% |
| Max drawdown | -44.64% | -34.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDA and SCHG
Explore further