Screener
FNDB vs KAT
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- FNDB costs 0.50% less per year.
- FNDB follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDB | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $688M |
| Since | 2013 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.17% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDB and KAT
Explore further