Screener
FNDB vs LRGC
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Key differences
- FNDB costs 0.14% less per year.
- FNDB follows a index tracking strategy; LRGC uses active selection.
- FNDB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDB | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.2% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 12.03% |
| Max drawdown | -38.17% | -19.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDB and LRGC
Explore further