Screener
FNDB vs SAMT
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FNDB costs 0.41% less per year.
- FNDB is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FNDB follows a index tracking strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDB | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $619M |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.89% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -38.17% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDB and SAMT
Explore further