Screener
FNDC vs KAT
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- FNDC costs 0.36% less per year.
- FNDC is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDC follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDC | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $688M |
| Since | 2013 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.48% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.24% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.22% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDC and KAT
Explore further