Screener
FNDE vs DEHP
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
Key differences
- FNDE is significantly larger than DEHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDE follows a index tracking strategy; DEHP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DEHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDE | DEHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.4B | $396M |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 1.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | +55.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 20.21% |
| Max drawdown | -39.89% | -22.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDE and DEHP
Explore further