Screener
FNDF vs INTL
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.59% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDF is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FNDF covers global ex us markets; INTL covers global.
- FNDF follows a index tracking strategy; INTL uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDF | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23.1B | $222M |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.9% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -40.14% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDF and INTL
Explore further