Screener
FNDX vs ACGR
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF vs American Century ETF Trust - American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FNDX follows a index tracking strategy; ACGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ACGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDX | ACGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.9B | — |
| Since | 2013 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +15.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.39% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -37.72% | -34.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDX and ACGR
Explore further