Screener
FNDX vs DFAS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FNDX follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDX | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.9B | $14.0B |
| Since | 2013 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.39% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -37.72% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDX and DFAS
Explore further