Screener
FNDX vs EPSB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FNDX costs 0.63% less per year.
- FNDX is significantly larger than EPSB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDX | EPSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.9B | $5M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.39% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -37.72% | -8.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDX and EPSB
Explore further