Screener
FNDX vs LRGC
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Key differences
- FNDX costs 0.14% less per year.
- FNDX is significantly larger than LRGC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDX follows a index tracking strategy; LRGC uses active selection.
- FNDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDX | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.9B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.39% | 12.03% |
| Max drawdown | -37.72% | -19.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDX and LRGC
Explore further