Screener
FNK vs EPMV
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund vs Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FNK costs 0.14% less per year.
- FNK is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNK | EPMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $217M | $4M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -50.70% | -8.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNK and EPMV
Explore further