Screener
FNX vs FEMS
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund vs First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FNX costs 0.18% less per year.
- FNX is significantly larger than FEMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNX covers north america markets; FEMS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, FNX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNX | FEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $264M |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.84% | 4.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.17% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -43.95% | -47.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNX and FEMS
Explore further