Screener
FORH vs AGOX
Formidable ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FORH costs 0.14% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AGOX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $364M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and AGOX
Explore further