Screener
FORH vs APCB
Formidable ETF vs ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- APCB costs 0.83% less per year.
- APCB is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while APCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; APCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | APCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $919M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 4.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -6.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and APCB
Explore further