Screener
FORH vs BGRO
Formidable ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.64% less per year.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; BGRO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $9M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 18.05% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and BGRO
Explore further