Screener
FORH vs CABZ
Formidable ETF vs Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF
Key differences
- CABZ costs 0.60% less per year.
- FORH is significantly larger than CABZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; CABZ uses structured outcome.
- FORH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | CABZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $1M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -22.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and CABZ
Explore further