Screener
FORH vs FVAL
Formidable ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 1.04% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while FVAL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and FVAL
Explore further