Screener
FORH vs GSLC
Formidable ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 1.10% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while GSLC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, GSLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $15.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 11.85% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and GSLC
Explore further