Screener
FORH vs MEMA
Formidable ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
- MEMA costs 0.34% less per year.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; MEMA uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $12M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -13.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and MEMA
Explore further