Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FOTO vs DRSK

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF vs Aptus Defined Risk ETF

FOTO

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

DRSK

Aptus Defined Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.78%

Fund size

$1.5B

Key differences

  • FOTO is classified as equity, while DRSK is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • FOTO follows a active selection strategy; DRSK uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

FOTODRSK
Annual cost (TER)0.78%
Fund size (AUM)$1.5B
Since2018
Dividend yield3.72%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+10.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+9.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.2%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.77
Volatility 1Y8.21%
Max drawdown-19.87%

Similar to FOTO and DRSK